Your scene
You talked wisely, I don't agree with the poster of this thread, concerning how lazy employees works exceptional than the hardworking one. Automatically that lazy employee, he talk it's lazy made u_turn and become hardworking. No lazy person can succeed in any business or company.
Hiring a lazy employee can be advantageous or disadvantageous. In the event that a company is inundated with lazy staff, the obvious result is that very little work will get done. However, where the proportion of hardworking employees far outweighs the lazy ones, there is a high chance that more work will get done because the lazy employees may find easier ways to do mundane tasks.I keep asking myself why Big companies keep lazy Employees. A CEO of Top Tech company once said he will hire the laziest of all employees to do the hardest Job reason being that such employees due to their nature will device an easier way or technique to get the Job done which tend to be more effective and efficient using less productive hours. Most big companies outdere use this method to get job done because it's cost effective while maintaining the quality as specified by the job description. I once experiment this and the result was awesome ever since and I also noticed some companies have a ratio of lazy Employees they keep at work which ranges from 10% -20% of the total working employees.
If opportuned, Will you hire a lazy Employee to balance the work place?