Would you rather hire a manager or run the site(s) yourself?

[tyrim88]

Managing a site requires you to have some knowledge of how the web works,but i would like a situation where i can be able to manage my site by myself,because it is my business and i know exactly what i want and the process of growth i want to acheive.And it will save me some cost.

 

[Bookwormlux1]

If I am really engaged and making money elsewhere I would first consider selling the website at a high rate, if I do not get a buyer, then I can hire a manager to maintain the website.

 

[Kunkun]

Well it would depend on some factors, if I'm the right person for the job them I probably would bit if there is someone that could do a better job than I would then I see no reason not to delegate

 

[Anis Boukezzoula]

if you have the time to manage your platform lonely then it's better to rely on yourself to save money and be more comfort however if your site is famous and has traffic, you should find someone reliable and honest to let him work and help you.

 

[Kane]

If your website is your business and if you are earning really well from your website but you do not have time to manage your website, you need to hire a manager.

 

[Psalmseen]

If I own a site.. And I have other things I venture into, the best option is to hire a manager for good management. So thevl existence of the site won't be an history

 

[Richard92]

This depends on what kind of website I am operating. If the website is ecommerce website, i will hire a professional manager to manage my site rather than trust myself

Ideas on site and know how tight do you operate you can be able to run your site yourself but if you have other business and you prefer a manager to run it for you it's okay.

 

[Justin]

If you do not have knowledge and skills to operate a site, you should never launch your site. Never attempt to do anything that you do not have knowledge and skills.

 

[Sotherefore]

Since I have a lot of other activities that is going on in my life I would like to hire someone to handle my site for me,this will really be the best because that a lot of things I need to focus more now, hiring a manager is the best.

 

[Snazzy001]

I would like to run the website myself if I have the luxury of time to do so but in the event where there is no time it is advisable to hire a manager who would do the work better for you

 

[Bousine123]

If I have the funds, I'll get an experienced person to manage my site for me. But if I don't, I will have to be the one to be managing it.

 

[Yusuf1]

Hiring a manager or running a website on my own depend on a whole number of factor. For example, if am very busy I will definitely give the website to a manager to manage for me and vice versa

 

[Hena101]

It depends on the individual with the site is he learned enough to manage the site or not if he is not then hiring someone to manage the site is best for him.

 

[jeff87]

Would you rather hire a manager to run your site, or would you rather do that all yourself. It would be cheaper to run yourself, but sometimes having a manager gives you more time to devote to other work and sites being worked on. I like the idea of hiring someone soon to run a couple of my sites. I just need a break and I think this would be a great idea.

If I have a lot of money, I will hire a manager to my business. I will delegate some jobs to him. But he will be answerable to me if the business is not doing good.

 

[Bookwormlux1]

If it is someone I know has the capacity and is trustworthy , I would rather pay them to help me manage the website on my behalf.

 

[Setho]

This will greatly depend on the amount of work I have to be doing because if I am going to be very busy then hiring another person to manage my website is going to be a good idea.

 

[Good-Person]

Depending on my schedules, I would rather I run it myself. Buy if I were the busy type of person, I would simply and quickly get a manager for the job

I believe that you should never hire a person to manage your site if your website is in the initial stages of development. You must only hire a person to manage your website if your website has gained much success.

 

[Nurudeen]

If I have a website the best thing is to ruj ot myself from the beginning of the website and develop it myself before handing it over for someone to help me manage in the long run

 

[Good-Person]

I think I would prefer to manage it myself and hire someone to just help in some other stuff. You know how forum admins usually hire moderators? That is what I would do. They don't have full control of the site but they help out in some things for I know that I may not manage to do it all myself.

I would also like to hire a manager to do the job for me. However, I would only hire a manager if I am really earning massive amount of income from my website. I will only hire experienced and talented manager because I would not risk losing my traffic!

 

[Billy]

Would you rather hire a manager to run your site, or would you rather do that all yourself. It would be cheaper to run yourself, but sometimes having a manager gives you more time to devote to other work and sites being worked on. I like the idea of hiring someone soon to run a couple of my sites. I just need a break and I think this would be a great idea.

Yes, it is a good idea to hire someone. But this should be done later on when you have done the job yourself and you understand the magnitude of the job. Also, working hands-off sometimes is risky because you have trade secrets and clients on your site, you wouldn't want someone to have all this from the word go. You should be in control at least for the first few years until you feel it is becoming overwhelming.

Also, if you think you don't have the necessary expertise to run the technical side of the blog, you can outsorce.