Hi, Teg
Thank you very much for taking the time to review the design of much of what makes up my company and brand.
Below are the addressing of everything you stated.
As far as the designs are concerned, I love the Hosting Site layout and the colors work well together. Everything seems to flow nicely, things are easy to find.
I am very glad to see that it doesn't only looks very well but that the fact that everything is simple to find on the website.
In regards to the status page, I think you should reverse the orange/blue colors. Instead of orange being the background, make it the darker blue and then use shades of orange for the four boxes towards the top. The way that page is right now, it hurts the eyes because of its brightness and color interference between the orange and white.
I firstly apologize for the Status Page is be harmful for the eyes. But I am afraid that I cannot "finely" control those boxes that your recommending me. As I only have current controls of the Header, Footer, and the background colors.
Could you please advise me on how I may want to adjust those colors in order to make it easily read instead of causing pain to the eyes?
As for the prices and such, I think that's way too much given you can get much more than what is offered by the bigger hosting companies. Just a personal opinion though.
I won't lie that my prices aren't the
most economical options out there but that is done for a couple of reasons...
1. The products will be loaded on quality hardware and upgraded
regularly to assure the customers get the same quality (if not better) no matter when their accounts were added. With larger brands sometimes you are at the mercy of being on a newly provisioned box to be able to enjoy a quality service...
2. Because of no. 1 I am able to allow customers to use more CPU/RAM/etc (within reasons of course) in order to grow and expand their businesses/communities. Furthermore I will do what I can to assure the customers has a chance to either fix the "resource abuse" (as they occurs) or to elect to pay for a upgraded shared account (no VPS/dedicated up selling here). Failing that I will still provide a full latest Cpanel account should a customer not be able to cooperate. So suspending/terminating an account solely for resource "abuse" aims to be the very rare occurrence as commercially possible.
3. "essentials" you won't believe it but there are hosts (even "big" ones) that don't provide the "mustard and ketchup" of hosting. For instance there are
still providers who will charge you for a dedicated IP and/or for a certificate which you are forced to purchase. Instead of providing equivalent services like AutoSSL by Cpanel or Let's Encrypt (and if they do they may still charge you a "installation fee" to make something anyways). I firmly believe in providing included features that should exists in the first place and is commercially reasonable to provide as such.
4. Of course then finally full best efforts support. Cheaper (and even some "premium" ones) may still charge you a fee for "3rd party application support" and/or other "support" that isn't has to do with the server itself. While I get the liability should ends there, if someone need help setting something up or configuring it I don't see why not to provide best efforts support if it possible. In short I see hosting customers as more as "partners" rather than "just clients" so if they need something I am do my best to address such.
So in the end of all of that, I don't claim nor aims to be the cheapest provider in the world. But rather to be a provider that bring entirely different set of features and such "to the table".
Hope to see from you soon regarding recommendations and if there anything else you would like to share do let us know.