For us on my forum, there is me the owner(Jokingly referred to as Queen) and a Lead Admin who is essentially my second in command.
Then there are my Super Mods who are like min-admins(Similar to a Lead but they have less features and Lead admins can act independently of me without overruling me where as Super Mods cant make major decisions i.e. software upgrades/changes)
Then my moderators who handled forum stuff and are the social guys.
We have a Checks and Balance system where all people (including myself) can be checked and if necessary balanced/outruled In a decision IF the staff feels a member of the staff made an unjust decision (For example banning or deleting a user).
Then there is a 'trial' where all involved parties present their facts and an objective person usually decides on course of action. This is ideal because it prevents corruption as well as it gives lower ranked staff power to overrule higher leadership without fear of being attacked.
Then there are my Super Mods who are like min-admins(Similar to a Lead but they have less features and Lead admins can act independently of me without overruling me where as Super Mods cant make major decisions i.e. software upgrades/changes)
Then my moderators who handled forum stuff and are the social guys.
We have a Checks and Balance system where all people (including myself) can be checked and if necessary balanced/outruled In a decision IF the staff feels a member of the staff made an unjust decision (For example banning or deleting a user).
Then there is a 'trial' where all involved parties present their facts and an objective person usually decides on course of action. This is ideal because it prevents corruption as well as it gives lower ranked staff power to overrule higher leadership without fear of being attacked.