Lurking members of communities...
It happens quite a bit and has happened for a long time. We know this. We might have even been these lurkers before.
What do admins usually do with lurkers?
I know of a few likely responses over the years...
Instead of ignoring or deleting, we should be engaging the disengaged of the community.
What do you think about that so far?
Instead of pretending lurkers aren't there or deleting them, why don't we send them a message and engage with them until they answer us. Then form a relationship in private and continue to encourage them to be active on the community.
What is there to lose? I mean if they want to be removed - they were lurkers to begin with right?
What do you all thing about this concept and how would it be best to engage the disengaged? Are you doing it now? If so, please share some tips!
It happens quite a bit and has happened for a long time. We know this. We might have even been these lurkers before.
What do admins usually do with lurkers?
I know of a few likely responses over the years...
- Typical - ignore lurkers and let them lurk
- Extreme - delete or even ban lurkers
Instead of ignoring or deleting, we should be engaging the disengaged of the community.
What do you think about that so far?
Instead of pretending lurkers aren't there or deleting them, why don't we send them a message and engage with them until they answer us. Then form a relationship in private and continue to encourage them to be active on the community.
What is there to lose? I mean if they want to be removed - they were lurkers to begin with right?
What do you all thing about this concept and how would it be best to engage the disengaged? Are you doing it now? If so, please share some tips!