You could have said nothing and it wouldn't have changed the point of anything I'd said. We've all heard it all before, nothing has changed.
Register or log in to explore all our content and services for free on Admin Junkies.
Github GraphQL.... Need I say more?They're all like that. The bigger they are the worse they are
Of course, we all know you are the final say in all things reasonable with scripts and the final say in what words mean.You could have said nothing and it wouldn't have changed the point of anything I'd said. We've all heard it all before, nothing has changed.
Github GraphQL.... Need I say more?
No no, you can keep him. 🤣Grass is always greener. You're getting quite worked up. If you want to switch switch.
Just curious, can you explain for the non technical people?Github GraphQL.... Need I say more?
GraphQL is a way of letting the client specify what data it wants from an API.No no, you can keep him. 🤣
Just curious, can you explain for the non technical people?
Don't worry... for the Astro site it would never happen because IPS doesn't offer what I require for extending it, and even Pages doubtfully has that ability.No no, you can keep him.
As many bugs as they have, I'd be hesitant of running on a live site. Might be OK to play with on a development site.Seems that 2.3 beta is out.
What's obvious is that some fanboys will not see the problem there, lol.As many bugs as they have, I'd be hesitant of running on a live site. Might be OK to play with on a development site.
Didn't someone make a post over there about the gigantic increase in the outstanding bug reports numbers recently?
(as I go check again).... well, looks like that thread got moderated and posts calling stuff like that out appears to have been removed.
But 22 pages of listed bug reports (with maybe 2 pages worth having 3rd party or cannot reproduce comments and that only dealing with the core and not importers or 1st party add-ons) dating back to 2019 is quite a few open bug reports.
Nope... they will simply be overly aroused by seeing 2.3 of some flavor being released. It's been so long since they released a "major" release that used a BETA (4 years approximately) I'm sure the fanbois are slavering.What's obvious is that some fanboys will not see the problem there, lol.
Just curious, what was the release like for 2.2 or 2.1?As many bugs as they have, I'd be hesitant of running on a live site. Might be OK to play with on a development site.
Didn't someone make a post over there about the gigantic increase in the outstanding bug reports numbers recently?
(as I go check again).... well, looks like that thread got moderated and posts calling stuff like that out appears to have been removed.
But 22 pages of listed bug reports (with maybe 2 pages worth having 3rd party or cannot reproduce comments and that only dealing with the core and not importers or 1st party add-ons) dating back to 2019 is quite a few open bug reports.
I’ll be waiting till beta is over with to upgrade.Seems that 2.3 beta is out.
Announcement:
https://xenforo.com/community/threads/xenforo-add-ons-2-3-0-beta-1-released-unsupported.220126
I'll be waiting until the BETA is over, and then the first release bug-squashing period is done and they release 1 or two more point releases.I’ll be waiting till beta is over with to upgrade.
It wasn't bad.... the problem currently is they sat spinning on their thumbs spinning around for so long that a lot of 2.2 related bugs built up, then they've made changes in 2.3 that caused additional bugs (as well as apparently not addressing older bugs) so it's all catching up in one massive wave.Just curious, what was the release like for 2.2 or 2.1?
IPS was very rough with their releases in the early days (I distinctly remember releases like 4.0.19.4!), but it definitely got better as the product line hit 4.2 and 4.3.
Log in or register to unlock full forum benefits!