My favourite is
Linux Mint.
For those who've never used Linux, here's my one sentence review of all the linux distros, ahem, distributions.
I've never used Mandriva so I can't comment on that.
When I was a child, most Linux distributions was just "someone else's linux except a handful of tweaks" but as linux had matured (I hope) most of those distributions got defunct or discontinued, as it was easier for regular users, tweakers and modders to be changing various settings and "under the hood" things, in a way so that creating a new linux distro wasn't needed any more.
Pivoting from the home market to servers and enterprise
- Ubuntu
- Fedora
- Red Hat
- OpenSUSE
My one sentence review
- Fedora - By using GNOME as a desktop environment, it is a step backwards as GNOME 3 is worse than GNOME 2. The problem isn't the kiddish Fisher-Price design, it's that you've removed the customisability, flexibility and exploration, as by using excessive abstraction, the information we're accustomed to seeing as modders and tweakers, is newly gone, so remember that we don't like things dumbed down like Mac and iTunes users, we like to see what's going on with our devices as it does it, for howlever long or current it did it.
- Element OS - Ditto.....kiddish.....see above....trying to be like the mac
- Zorin OS - Ditto.....kiddish.....see above....trying to be like the mac
- Pop OS - Ditto.....kiddish.....see above....trying to be like the mac
- Arch - For those who love modding more than the typical modder, as it's heavy on the command line
- CentOS - Newly deprecated but it's designed for servers
- Debian - It's designed for servers wanting stability between software upgrades and Long Term Support (LTS) as every package in its official Debian package manager, cannot be updated for 5 years, once the version number is updated there (unless there's a security vulnerability obviously)
Why do I prefer Linux Mint to Ubuntu?
It appears to be that the modus operandi of Ubuntu is to be a CLOSET open source purist, despite them allowing me to download propretiary NVidia and Intel graphics card drivers in their repository manager. Or so it seems! When I installed Flash Player in Firefox and watched a youtube video, of all websites, it kept being choppy and jumping and the official forum and Stack Exchange couldn't help me. I then switched to Linux Mint and the issue was gone and when I got a glitch watching videos in VLC, let alone Youtube, the Linux Mint helped me change some settings in how to fix it and they gave me soem CLOSED source software that was in the Linux Mint software repository that wasn't available in the Ubuntu repository.
Why is Ubuntu trying to impose their open source purist philosophy on me? I do music production and web design so as someone who uses creative software with lots of plugins and sometimes plugins connected to other plugins, I can't really have bugs, freezes and glitches in the host software and plugin software, can I?
I then noticed that under Linux Mint, the sound quality was much better when recording my microphone into Audacity and the delay between recording and the sound appearing on the screen, was gone.
Forget convention over configuation (like rails framework), I'm all about toolsets over toolkits (like lua).
Also the MATE and Cinnamon desktop environment, is much better than GNOME 3 and it's actively developed too. Cinnamon is a
spiritual successor of GNOME 2 as the way it should of been succeeded whereas MATE went in their own crazy unique direction.