Balancing Experience and Fresh Perspective for Staff Members

[Cedric]

Do you think there should be a minimum set time between being registered as a member and being hired as staff? Or would you hire a member as Staff who's only been part of the community for a week or so?

There are some valid arguments on both sides. On one hand, some argue that experience within the community is crucial for staff members. They believe that those who have been around for a longer time are more likely to understand the community's culture, its rules, and its dynamics. They may have built trust with other members, making them more effective in their staff roles.

On the other hand, there's the perspective that fresh faces can bring new energy, ideas, and perspectives to a community. They might not be steeped in the community's history, but they can offer a different point of view and help keep things innovative. Plus, hiring newer members can be a great way to encourage active participation and engagement right from the start.

So, what's your take on this? Have you ever faced this dilemma in your community? If so, how did you handle it? Are there any specific criteria or guidelines you follow when considering members for staff roles? Share your experiences and insights—it could help others make informed decisions in their own communities.

Eager to hear your thoughts